Dan Plonsey's Music Manifesto
(as of February, 2003)
These are some of the axioms which underlie what I'm doing with
music, both as composer and improviser. I don't mean to imply
that anyone else ought to adhere to these axioms, nor do I think
that everyone will find the same means to make music, should they
agree with any of this. What's important to me is that we do think
about what we're doing.
- Perfection is a myth. I like to work with musicians of varying
abilities, strengths, weaknesses. I don't want musicians to conform
to my particular ideas about how to play an instrument, preferring
variety (diversity) over uniformity. As the audience
becomes aware of the virtues of the imperfect, recognizes that
there are members of my ensemble who aren't virtuosi by any
"normal" standard, they will hopefully feel more willing to risk
creating things themselves, less afraid of "failure."
- Likewise, I try not to edit melodies much: we don't always
know what is important in the ideas that come to us, so again,
in the name of diversity, I often keep parts which seem inexplicable,
absurd, simple-minded or weak: often they end up being much more
interesting than the "strong" ones.
- Making more is better than making less. Sun Ra said that the
Creator demands of us that we each create at least one thing per day,
but that he [Sun Ra] tried to stay ahead by making more than one thing.
I say: yeah, just as it's always better to cook too much pasta than
too little, given how little it costs.
- Finding beauty in things which are small, damaged, underrated,
flawed, etc., seems a worthy pursuit in a world which seems bent
on destroying those individuals and those ideas which don't fit in,
which aren't useful as consumers or consumable.
- Solos which teeter at the edge of the void are not only more dramatic,
more encouraging to the audience to take risks as artists, but are
also part of my personal preparation for dying. ("oooo! heavy!")
- Polyphony - having several ideas happening at once, especially
in conflict - reflects the way of nature, depth of vision,
and of human variety and interaction, multiple levels of meaning,
multiple points of view, and again, undermines notion of perfection.
- Unison (of a ragged sort) allows the audience to most
easily know that a section is written, while at the same time
the "flaws" in the unison reflect anti-perfectionism.
Musicians are encouraged to ornament, or do mini-improvs.
Also, if some idea (e.g., a melody) seems a bit odd to us, our
tendency is to undermine that idea by speaking tentatively.
Big unisons are a way to make certain that the most improbable
ideas get a good chance to make their point.
- Imperfect intonation thickens unison lines (I think of Richard
Diebenkorn's late work when I think of "thickening lines":
the way certain painted lines
are emphasized by being
painted over, or by being imperfectly erased).
Imperfect intonation also reflects a
sort of state of ensemble
cooperation in which the individual is neither alone
nor subsumed into a whole.
- If I can communicate to the musicians that they can have
fun with the music, then they will hopefully put more of
themselves into it, and ultimately take the work more seriously,
also enhancing the polyphony. Such music also refers to and
supports the style of teaching in which the student is engaged
by encouraging him/her to question the teacher. In general, this
is the basis too for a highly participatory democracy in which we come
together to do one another's projects not out of obligation, but
for the pleasure of interaction, and the testing of ideas, and
we lose our need to be too polite.
- Form should be fairly apparent to a listener: I want the audience
to know as much as possible about a piece, rather than engage in
any undercover manipulation. But there must be some surprises for
them - and for me.
- Straight use or reference to modal idioms
allows the audience to grasp relationships among larger "chunks"
of the piece, while also providing for possibilities of deviation
from large and small scale expectations.
- Also, music with oddly mixed elements of the "exotic" is meant
not only to kindle pleasure in diversity, but to encourage a vision of a
world in which the emphasis is on cooperation.
- And also there's some developing sense I have that music of
properly mixed modes has certain "magical" power to guide those
us when we're lost and alone (and hence at high potential moments for
creativity).
- It's important to me to develop extra-musical images or stories
while developing the music. These help to particularize each
piece. It's important to me that each piece have its own
character, reinforcing again the notion that society of
well-formed, clearly unique characters is far preferable to
masses/mobs of folks who can hardly be told apart, whose identity is
driven too much by what's "in." Even when approaching a
free improv, I want to know: who am I? what's my motivation?
am I a guy who's contrary, oblivious, sad, taciturn, studious,
responsive, blustery, or what? I also want to know: where are we?
in the woods? in outer space? in the past? in the future?
Am I exploring? trying to escape? trying to connect?
(This is why I challenge the myth of "Artistic Integrity"
which I see as implying that there's only one way to be
which is "me." Well, I'm not some single particle following a
pre-determined path through the cosmos. I have a lot of choices.)
- Imagination. Just to follow up on the above, I don't see
art as simply acceptance of what comes. I think the artist's
will and efforts, in conjunction with his/her imagination is
equally important. That is, I actively go out there looking
for ideas; and I want to "make things up." And I want my
music to clearly reflect the value of such searching and
inventing. (Recall Schoenberg's description of Cage as an
"inventor," and reconcile this with the picture people often
have of Cage as a passive acceptor.)
- Humor - as in surprises, and a certain degree of self-mockery,
is employed as a weapon against fascism, both from outside,
and from inside (the temptaion to get dictatorial, full of
oneself). Also, it keeps me & the audience on our collective toes;
it allows them to interact with the musicians (often laughter
is the only sound an audience will make while music is happening).
Furthermore, many people are more comfortable making contact
with one who has a sense of humor.
- Absurdity: allied with humor. Rule of thumb: if you have two
ideas, go with the one which is more absurd. Twenty people
playing simple
melodies, plus my six-year-old son, on Western and Eastern instruments,
plus tuned Balinese percussion, calling it "Jazz," at Yoshi's...
well, it seemed to me that doing that might strike a few people as
inexplicable, odd, or absurd - in the "right" way, and inspire thoughts about the
wonder, mystery, and unknowable extent to all that is or might be...
Dan Plonsey
February 13, 2003
Send mail to:
Dan Plonsey.